🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold action to prohibit social networking access for young people below 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are observing with great interest to see if this approach will become a template for the rest of the world.

The European Movement

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of nations are considering comparable bans.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister declaring that smartphones and apps are "stealing our kids' youth". The policy may be enacted soon.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard young people from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to verify the user details of social media users. The media minister have indicated that an similar ban could be "an measures under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged parliament to enact a proposal lifting the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has suggested a comparable step, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Dutch government has urged guardians to restrict their kids from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has adopted a non-binding statement supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 without a parent decides otherwise is provided. Although it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these apps, the move does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A clear age barrier is a useful first step," said one European lawmaker supporting the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Stance

Across Britain, the leadership has not ruled out a possible ban, stating that "no option is being dismissed" but maintaining any policy must be "based on conclusive research".

Last year, momentum gathered behind a proposal to impose controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately watered down. However, the government committed to conduct more studies the issue.

Campaign organizations have expressed concerns. An organization set up by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after viewing harmful platform posts suggests that a simple age ban might not make platforms safer and could lead to a "cliff edge" of risk when young people turn 16.

"This ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to create products and services that are secure and age appropriate for young users," commented a prominent child protection advocate.

The US: A Decentralized Landscape

In the United States, legislation is mostly unfolding at the local level against a backdrop of country-wide gridlock.

• Utah requires adult approval for minors to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a bill banning children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation capping teenagers to a single hour of social media access per day, with additional use dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced laws mandating guardian approval for under-16s to set up social media presences.

Despite bipartisan support and calls from certain politicians to copy Australia's lead, a federal ban is currently seen as improbable.

International Perspectives

Beyond the West, other nations are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, world agencies take a more nuanced position. Unicef has cautioned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "could backfire". The agency points out that social networks can be a "critical link" for isolated young people and that bans should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to improve safety.

As this international conversation continues, the steps of the Australian government and several other countries show that governments around the world are less and less willing to delay for platforms to act voluntarily.